Positive Youth Justice: A Model to Support Youth

Our Staff

NCCD Blog

Positive Youth Justice: A Model to Support Youth

Jeffrey A. Butts, PhD, Director, Research and Evaluation Center, John Jay College of Criminal Justice

We ask youth justice systems to protect the public by preventing and reducing law violations by young people. To accomplish this mission, every component of youth justice should pursue sensible strategies. Policies and practices should be conceptually sound and consistent with what we know about adolescent behavior and the true origins of delinquency.

Unfortunately, this does not happen. Instead, systems adopt policies that are easy to embrace. We are attracted to programs that are politically acceptable and economically appealing to public officials and to the bureaucracies they oversee. The basic question is about theory—why do young people get caught up in the justice system?

American culture is predisposed to see crime as a symptom of mental disorder, so programs that offer mental health supports are readily welcomed. Similarly, substance use is considered aberrant or deviant. Thus, policy makers are always amenable to using justice resources to combat drug use. Most Americans assume that “bad kids” come from “bad families,” which makes family therapy programs an easy sell.

Certainly, all of these problems are important contributors to a young person’s chances of becoming involved in the justice system, but they are not wholly sufficient as a framework for policy and practice. If our goal is to mitigate whatever factors are most likely to draw young people into contact with the justice system, the interventions we provide should reflect what we know about adolescents and the conditions facing young people in the United States today.

We should design solutions for the most pertinent problems, and not for the most popular problems.

We know that the frustration and rage brought on by school failure can lead youth to see crime as a means of gaining self-worth and the respect of peers; but, rather than correct our bad schools we provide remedial programs that stigmatize and punish youth who fail to make it on their own. We know that one of the best ways to keep young people away from crime is to engage them in meaningful and rewarding work, but we fail to intervene when they are systematically excluded from the labor force. We know that the prolonged use of alcohol and other drugs is associated with a criminal lifestyle; but, instead of finding different ways for youth to get the fun and excitement they obviously crave, we coerce them into abstaining from drugs even when they live in a culture that surrounds them with pro-drug messages.

Recently, my colleagues and I worked with the Coalition for Juvenile Justice to devise a different approach. Our Positive Youth Justice (PYJ) model offers youth justice systems a different way to think about youth behavior. The PYJ model is built from the concepts of positive youth development. It blends lessons from the science of adolescent development with practices suggested by positive youth development to provide an effective framework for designing interventions. The model encourages justice systems to focus on protective factors as well as risk factors, strengths as well as problems, positive outcomes as well as negative outcomes, and generally to focus on facilitating successful transitions to adulthood for justice-involved youth.

We designed the PYJ model specifically for justice-involved youth. Positive youth development concepts are obviously compatible with many youth programs, but they have to be narrowly focused in justice settings. The most common approaches to positive youth development presume that young people possess conventional attitudes and a ready willingness to cooperate with pro-social peers and adults. These are not qualities that one finds in abundance among youth involved with the juvenile court and the larger youth justice system. Almost by definition, justice-involved youth have a greater inclination than other youth to violate rules, to disregard convention, and to defy authority.

All youth, including those already involved in the justice system, need supports and opportunities that facilitate their successful transition to adulthood. Even youth who require specialized treatments still need basic developmental supports if they are to avoid future criminality and learn to lead positive, productive adult lives. The PYJ model is designed to help youth justice systems conceptualize and implement such interventions.

Jeffrey A. Butts, PhD, is director of the Research and Evaluation Center at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York. Previously he was a research fellow with Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago and director of the Program on Youth Justice at the Urban Institute. Dr. Butts began his career in Oregon, first as a juvenile court drug and alcohol counselor in Eugene and then as a public child welfare caseworker in Portland. He completed a PhD at the University of Michigan and worked on projects at the Institute for Social Research and the Center for the Study of Youth Policy.

Submitted by Visitor on April 28, 2014 - 2:33pm.

The PYD approach that Dr. Butt's writes about is a critical advance in youth justice policy: It takes the "my child" standard, and applies it to every young person and family the system serves. While the field has a long, long, long (long) way to go, the PYD approach that is taking hold in systems in the Northeast and West hold real promise.

Submitted by Visitor on April 28, 2014 - 5:08pm.

You're absolutely right that our business-as-usual approach is incomplete, focusing only on deficits and challenges, and not on strengths and ways to help youth develop the skills they need -- and that so many of us take for granted -- to become adults who are an asset to their communities. And the PYJ model is a great way to help jurisdictions take a more holistic approach. I wonder, however, if you have more material forthcoming about sites that have actually started to implement the model? I think many jurisdictions like the idea of PYJ but are still unsure how to implement it. Also, do you think the tendency to see youth crime in terms of individual choice and responsibility (which implies that the solution is also entirely up to the individual youth) is a significant barrier to the

Submitted by Visitor on April 28, 2014 - 5:09pm.

You're absolutely right that our business-as-usual approach is incomplete, focusing only on deficits and challenges, and not on strengths and ways to help youth develop the skills they need -- and that so many of us take for granted -- to become adults who are an asset to their communities. And the PYJ model is a great way to help jurisdictions take a more holistic approach. I wonder, however, if you have more material forthcoming about sites that have actually started to implement the model? I think many jurisdictions like the idea of PYJ but are still unsure how to implement it. Also, do you think the tendency to see youth crime in terms of individual choice and responsibility (which implies that the solution is also entirely up to the individual youth) is a significant barrier to the

Submitted by Visitor on April 28, 2014 - 6:20pm.

I know of one place (DC's DYRS) that has really invested in the framework we offered in our PYJ publication and website. If you look at DYRS's annual report, you'll see the impact immediately. The first few pages are devoted to youth-specific outcomes divided into our six domains (work, education, relationships, etc.). Other jurisdictions, notably the state juv justice agences in Massachusetts and Oregon are very much committed to PYD approaches. I find Massachusetts' effort to be especially impressive, as they established strong partnerships across sectors (schools, probation, etc.) in order to provide support to youth without court involvement whenever necessary. Also, Massachuetts' long history of PYD-compatible advocacy and legal representation through the Youth Advocacy Division led

Submitted by Visitor on April 28, 2014 - 9:33pm.

Dr. Butts describes a classic paradigm shift that has been two steps forward, one step back. He is right in framing this challenge as one of moving beyond a set of core (often politically driven and outdated) assumptions about court involved young people and taking the risk to trust what common sense and years of research on adolescent development tell us about what young people of all colors and backgrounds need to succeed. This is easier said than done. In my experience on the ground designing and implementing programs that follow the core PYD principles in a juvenile justice and treatment setting is that the pull to compromise and to pander to the old paradigm is difficult to resist if one wants to get anything done...or funded. Interest in the PYD approach has never been higher - in

Submitted by Visitor on April 29, 2014 - 8:22am.

Dr. Butts' analysis should be read and implemented by juvenile justice commissioners everywhere. If we were to look at kids for what they could contribute - and truly individualize services for each child - we would have little need for any secure facilities. PYD principles also reflect what we all know about adolescence and how we, as adults, can help youth achieve social success. No one wants to be developed based on their deficits; but given the opportunity to help youth identify and explore their strengths and interests can reap great rewards, for them and for their families and communities. Also, I agree with the sentiment that legislators too frequently embrace programs that solve one symptom but fail to address - or even acknowledge - the underlying issues that contribute to

Add new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <img src alt height width> <em> <strong> <span> <cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Missing filter. All text is removed
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.