NCCD conducts program evaluations in juvenile justice, adult corrections, child welfare, adult protection, and poverty/economic support to estimate the impact of various programs, initiatives, and system-reform efforts on the populations served. Our highly qualified and experienced research staff employ quantitative and qualitative methods to conduct impact and process evaluations using various research design and methodological approaches to help answer questions about what works and to provide agencies with the evidence they need to show effectiveness.
For decades, NCCD has been at the forefront of promoting actuarial risk assessment to validly and reliably estimate the likelihood that an adult offender will engage in criminal activity. Agencies can then target interventions to offenders who are most likely to return to the system. Evaluations have repeatedly shown that actuarial risk assessment outperforms other methods for estimating recidivism.
NCCD is conducting a national study of widely used risk and needs assessments in juvenile justice. This study will provide the field with the best methods for determining how reliably and validly various risk/needs assessments function. Results from this multi-year effort, which is funded by the U.S. Department of Justice, will be available in 2012.
NCCD is internationally known for research on the risk of child maltreatment and has conducted studies in the United States, Australia, and in 2012, Canada. In addition, NCCD's impact evaluation of the Structured Decision Making® (SDM) system in child protective services found evidence that using the SDM® system can help lower maltreatment recurrence rates.
NCCD has made significant contributions to the adult protective services field with the introduction of the first risk assessment designed specifically for this population. The risk assessment was part of a multi-year study funded by National Institute of Justice and will be completed in 2012.
NCCD created the first assessment in the U.S. to validly and reliably estimate the likelihood that public financial assistance recipients will obtain and sustain employment. This assessment is used in welfare-to-work agencies to optimize resources by targeting employment services to recipients who need the most support with finding and keeping jobs.